FOUR ARTICLE’S REVIEW OF SEMANTICS
Hello
Good Readers,how’s life??? Well, I would like to share you the greatest article
about semantics that i get from my friends blog . But I am so interesting to
review again and also develop their article review. All of these review from
academia edu. check it out !!!!
(1). DESI NORI SAHPUTRI (https://desinorisahputri.blogspot.co.id/)
A. Demograph
Title : Theories of Semantics: Merits and Limitations
Searcher 1: Saleh Mustafa Ramadan
From :
Al-Zaytoonah Private University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Searcher 2: Taleb I. Ababneh
From :
Irbid National University- Jordan, Irbid, Jordan.
Pages :
9
B. Content
This
article explain about some theories.
These theories are: referential theory of meaning, the non– referential
theory of meaning and generative grammarian theory of meaning.
C. Result/Finding
Meaning is so intangible that one group of linguists, the
structuralists, preferred not to deal with it or rely on it at all. To
illustrate what we mean by the intangible quality of “meaning”, think of such
words as “beauty”, “goodness”, “love”; it would be hard to find two people who
agree absolutely on what each of these words implies.
Meaning as the Relationship between Words and
Objects
Greek philosophers say that there is a
relationship between words and objects. In other words, the best way of
indicating the meaning of a word is to refer to the object represented by that
word.
Meaning as a Triangular Relationship
The symbol is the spoken or written word;
the reference is the information that the spoken or written shape of the word
conveys to the reader/ hearer; and the referent is the thing or the object we
talk about.
Bloomfield’s View of Meaning
Bloomfield (1933) stated that the context
of situation was an essential part of meaning. He defined the meaning of a
linguistic form as the situation in which the speaker utters it and the
response which it calls forth in the hearer.
The
Non–Referential Theory of Meaning
The non–referential approach as suggested
by its name doesn’t take into consideration the context of situations or the
reference in determining what meaning is. There is a relationship between
language and the outside world because language doesn’t exist in vacuum.
Therefore, this may indicate a weakness in this theory.
The
Generative Grammarian Theory
This approach was based on the assumption
that syntactic rules operate independently of meaning. Chomsky and others
believe that changing the active into passive structures does not change the
meaning of the sentence.
D. Strengthness and Weakness
Strength
: The author give many theories of
meaning ,it is clear for us to differentiate
of meaning.
Weakness : The author just give theory but with little example
E. Conclusion
The researcher has discussed the main of
meaning ,their view about meaning
is nearly the same as of the Greekphilosophers. The only new thing they added
is that it is the human mind that links an object.
(2). NABILA FIRDA ASY’ARI (http://byeolinab.blogspot.co.id/)
A. Demograph
Title : Semantics and Theories of Semantics
Author : Abbas
Bukhari
Pages : 15
B. Content
This article shared how is
language organized in order to be meaningful, and how a
speaker
of English ever learns to use the word correctly.
C. Result/ Findings
Semantics is that level of
linguistic analysis
where meaning is analyzed. It is
the most abstract level of linguistic analysis, since we
cannot see or observe meaning as we
can observe and record sounds. Meaning is related
very closely to the human capacity
to think logically and to understand. So when we try
to analyze meaning, we are trying to
analyse our own capacity to think and understand,
our own ability to create meaning.
Taking up some of the
above definitions of meaning, we can discuss the different aspects
of meaning o a word as
follows :
1.The logical or denotative meaning. This is the literal meaning of a word indicating
the idea or concept to which it refers. concept is a minimal unit ofmeaning
which could be called a ‘sememe’ in the same way as the unit ofsound is
called a ‘phoneme’ and is like the ‘morpheme h Is structure andorganisation.
Just as the phoneme /b/ may be defined as a bilatial + voiced +plosive, the
word ‘man’ may be defined as a concept consisting of a structure of meaning
‘human + male + adult’ expressed through the basic morphological unit ‘m + æ +
n’. All the three qualities are logical attributes of which the concept ‘man’
is made.
2. The connotative meaning. This is the additional meaning that a concept carries. That is, apart from its logical or essential
attributes, there is a furthermeaning attached to a word, which comes from its
reference to other things in the real world.
3. The social meaning: This
is the meaning that a word or a phrase conveys about the circumstances of its
use. That is, the meaning of a word is understood according to the different style
and situation in which the word is used, e.g. though the words ‘domicile’,
‘residence’, ‘abode’, ‘home’ all refer to the same thing (i.e. their denotative
meaning is the same), each word belongs to a particular situation of
use—’domicile’ is used in an official context, ‘residence’ in a formal context,
‘abode’ is a poetic use and ‘home’ is an ordinary use. Where one is used, the
other is not seen as appropriate
4.The thematic meaning: This is the meaning which is communicated by the
way in which a speaker or writer organises the message in terms of ordering,
focus and emphasis. It is often felt, for example, that an active sentence has
a different meaning from its passive equivalent although its conceptual meaning
seems to be the same. In the sentences:
Mrs. Smith donated the first prize
The first prize was donated by Mrs. Smith
D. Strengthness and Weakness
Strength : This article gives
explanation based on daily activity and the author explanation of meaning follow related semantic between
phonology,i think it is easy to understand.
Weakness : This article make the
readers to confused because the Author write his paper with carelessness
E. Conclusion
Part of the difficulty in relating language to the external world may arise
from the fact that the way in which we see the world is to some degree depends
in the language we use. Since we categorize the objects of our experience with
the aid of language, it may be the case that learning about the world and
learning about language are activities that cannot be separated and that
therefore our world is partly determined by our language.
(4). ANNISA
SEPTIANI (http://annisaseptiani4.blogspot.co.id/)
A. Demograph
Title : Modern
Linguistics Semantics
Author : Kate
Kearns,Senior Lecturer, Department of Linguistics.
From :
University of Canterbury New Zealand.
Upload : Pooja
Saikia
B. Content
This article mainly concentrate on literal meaning in the content
of words and expressions which is fairly constant from one occasion of use to
another. The study of linguistic meaning is
generally divided in practice into two main fields,semantics and pragmatics.
Semantics deals with the literal meaning of words and the meaning of the way
they are combined, which taken together form the core of meaning, or the
starting point from which the whole meaning of a particular utterance is
constructed. Pragmatics This division can be roughly illustrated deals with all
the ways in which literal meaning must be refined, enriched or extended to
arrive at an understanding of what a speaker meant in uttering a particular
expression.
C. Result/Findings
This article present the kinds of
meaning:
1. Denotation
and sense
The general point is that
linguistic expressions are linked in virtue of their meaning to parts of the
world around us, which is the basis of our use of language to convey
information about reality. The denotation of an expression is the part of
reality the expression is linked to.
The second way of giving the
meaning of a word, commonly used in dictionaries, is to paraphrase it,
The most widely discussed form of
the sense/denotation distinction is the means‘the blue train’ is to say that
the French expression and the English expression have the same
sense.sense/reference distinction. An expression which denotes just
one individual is said to refer to that individual. Titles and proper
names are common referring expressions
2. Lexical
and Structural Meaning
lexical meaning, which is the
meaning of the individual words.
Structural meaning mainly comprises
the meaning derived from the syntactic structure of an expression, for example:
, which is the meaning of the way the words are combined.
3. Categorematic
expressions, which include the vast majority of words, are the descriptive
words such as nouns, adjectives and verbs.
D. Strengthness and Weakness
Strength : You can know more about modern
linguistic especially semantics by read this. And the example is enough to make
us understands. And there are some tips that have given by authors.
Weakness : this article too long
and very tedious to read.
E. Conclusion
From this article we know Current research suggests that the generalization
expressed in any version of thematic roles theory is basically correct –
arguments of verbs do fall into broad semantic classes, although the relevant
classes are not always those identified by the traditional thematic relations
introduced here.
(4). Ratna Sari (http://myblog-ratnasari.blogspot.co.id/)
A. Demograph
Title : Theories of Semantics: Merits and Limitations
Searcher 1: Saleh Mustafa Ramadan
From :
Al-Zaytoonah Private University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Searcher 2: Taleb I. Ababneh
From :
Irbid National University- Jordan, Irbid, Jordan.
Pages :
9
B. Content
This paper discussed semantic field, semantic relation and semantic
components. It characterised the semantic field of ‘motor vehicles’ in terms of
semantic component and discussed the advantages and disadvantages in the use of
field relations and components to describe the meaning of words.
C. Result/Findings
He solve of these question of the paper. The Question is:
a. What do you
understand by semantic field, semantic relation and semantic component?
b. Characterize the
semantic field of ‘motor vehicles’ in terms of semantic component.
c. What
advantages and disadvantages can you see in the use of field relations and
components to describe the meaning of words?
Question 1: What do you understand by semantic field, semantic relation and
semantic component?
Semantic Field
Semantic field is a set of words or
lexemes related in meaning; also called lexical field, field, or field of
meaning. Most often, fields are defined by subject matter, such as body
parts, landforms, diseases, colours, foods, or kinship relations.
The semantic field of 'water' could
be divided into a number of subfields; in addition, there would appear to be a
great deal of overlap between terms such as cove/harbour/bay.
There are lexical groups or
components that made up semantic field :
1. Meronymy
A meronym is a word that denotes a
constituent part or a member of something. For
example, apple is
a meronym of apple tree; Finger is a meronym of hand.
2. Sememe
A sememe is the name for the smallest unit of
meaning recognized in semantics,
a single sememe (for example [go] or [move]) can
be conceived as the abstract representation of such as verbs as skate, roll, jump, slide, skip or turn.
Semantic Relations
Semantic relations or meaning relations are words that are semantically
related to other words.
There are lexical groups or
components that made up semantic relation :
1. Synonym
2. Antonyms
3. Polysemy
4. Antagonymy
5. Homonymy
6. Hyponymy/hypernymy
D. Stregth and Weakness
Strengthness: This paper is full of explanation and so many examples.
The author had completed answer of that three question. You can get new
understanding of semantics in here.
Weakness: So many difficult vocabularies so you must open
your dictionary. But it will help you to improve your English.
E. Conclusion
Semantic field can give us advantages and disadvantages,the advantages
such as 1) Field relations and
componential analysis can account for selectional restrictions imposed upon the
occurrence of lexemes more explicitly 2)Field relations and components provide a wide
spectrum of meaning of a lexeme thereby providing the linguistic contextual
opportunity for hedging in communication. Disadvantages like Finding a specific meaning of a lexeme becomes difficult
except on pragmatic ground where context of usage could help to deduce the
meaning of a lexeme. For example, the lexeme ‘van’, how can we know what the
speaker refers to; a pickup van, a caravan, wagon, army wing, or camper?
Therefore meaning of a lexical item is inconsistent and might be misleading.
Komentar
Posting Komentar