SEMANTICS


ARTICLE REVIEW
  A. Searcher                : Diego GavagnaAarhus University 2013 
  B. Tittle of journal      : Frame semantics a brief introduction
  C.From                        : Aarhus University, 2013
  D.Pages                       : 12

Content
It tries to give a comprehensive explanation on how meanings are structured and associated to words in a semantic structure and how these provide access to our conceptual system, the inventory of structured knowledge that we use to navigate the world.This view gives account for relations between words that cannot just be ascribed to structural semantic relations like hyponymy, synonymy orantonymy. Instead, it describes the interdependencies between words based on background knowledge that humans acquire through experience and store in long-term memory.

Result/Findings
The frame is a knowledge system that provides a range of licensed relationships among the attributesdescribing the event-sequence potential of the frame. The human can identify the meaning of the words by they experience or activity in long time memory. Semantic is something that has complicated meaning. The overbalance from tihis journal is the searcher explain with the her experince and give us knowledge about semantic with detail,and the weakness of this journal is the writer not write the problem formulation and hyphotheses.
                                    
   Strength and Weakness
Strength : I think this article is fundamental knowledge of semantic and it is important for we know. And The author analysis is something new that we found of many article about semantic. I am so interested with the Frame semantics. The example is great. There are some pictures here. The letter that author used is so neat and will be easy to understand.
Weakness: The author said his dissertation is can not be considered exhaustive, but he have tried to give described the main terms of the theory.

Conclusion
Many other authors have developed this framework, including the remarkable attempt by Lakoff & Johnson in describing the concept of reframing in political discourse based on frame semantics’ approach and the role of metaphors and metonymy in natural languages. Lakoff’s approach is particularly interesting because it is not just an analytical framework but very much also a set of practical tools usable in everyday life.Another important contribution is the one proposed by Fauconier and Turner describing the characteristics of mental spaces that pose the ground for blending theory.
This article give an account for frame semantics approach to knowledge representations as described by Fillmore and the researchers that have developed his approach, including Langacker’s domains’ description and Barsalou perceptual symbols.



Komentar

  1. byeolinab6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.46

    Hi Sule ! You have told us about the review at the class but please make the real review based on your mind in this post.

    BalasHapus
  2. Diyanah maisurah6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.47

    your assignments is better than me

    BalasHapus
  3. Hotdiana Pasaribu6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.49

    Sule why do you not explain about the problem formulation?

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. SUSI LESTARI12 Juni 2017 pukul 07.38

      in this journal he is not give problem formulation but from that i read the problem from frame semantic is from assumption arise problems that can be exemplified by trying to define
      a concept like bachelor

      Hapus
  4. Nitaprakasiwi6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.50

    Can you give example about semantic?

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. SUSI LESTARI12 Juni 2017 pukul 07.39

      what do you mean? but i will give example semantic in daily life ,piece of cake,you are my sunshine..

      Hapus
  5. Dela Puzebang6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.50

    Well, thank you for review this article. But, why you did not make something for this PROBLEM FORMULATION,HYPOTHESES,EXPLANATION..
    Why you let it Kosong??? 😆

    BalasHapus
    Balasan
    1. SUSI LESTARI12 Juni 2017 pukul 07.40

      because in this journal not put his problem

      Hapus
  6. ADE GP6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.50

    Nice susi. It too long, can you give us your review in this post. Give the strengness and wikeness. Thx

    BalasHapus
  7. Desinorisahputri6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.50

    I think it is not brief introduction

    BalasHapus
  8. Unknown6 Maret 2017 pukul 17.55

    ididnot get the point about your article,-

    BalasHapus
  9. RATNA SARI, S.Pd7 Maret 2017 pukul 05.41

    that interesting, maybe the paragraph more better if the opinion of yours😃

    BalasHapus
  10. Unknown14 Maret 2017 pukul 04.52

    Is this a review or you put the words of your article/journal here ?
    Just straight to the point!
    No offense.

    BalasHapus
  11. srafiahmh16 Mei 2017 pukul 20.50

    Make it simple article Tari.. just put demography, contents, strength n weakness, conclusion.

    BalasHapus

Posting Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

ADVISABILITY:SHOULD,OUGHT TO,HAD BETTER

           Assalamualaikum reader,semoga sehat selalu yaa,kali ini tari bakalan ngepost/sghare ilmu sedikit ni tentang modal auxiliary khususnya penggunaan dari should,ought to,dan had better Dari buku yang saya baca yaitu bukunya mbak Betty Schrampfer Azar,dia menyatakan bahwa”Should and ought to have the same meaning:they express advisability . They meaning ranges in strength from a suggestion (“This is a good idea”)to a statement about responsibility or duty (“This a very important thing to do”). Ini artinya bahwa Should and Ought To memiliki arti yang sama: mereka mengungkapkan kelayakan. Mereka yang berarti rentang kekuatan dari saran ("Ini adalah ide yang baik") untuk pernyataan tentang tanggung jawab atau kewajiban ("hal ini sangat penting untuk dilakukan"). The verb should only exists in the simple present, and present perfect forms   Forms of should All persons Present Present perfect Affirmative should should
Baca selengkapnya

SYNTAX

Gambar
Assalamualaikum WR.WB HOW IS LIFE? In this my posting,I’m going to tell you about syntax,let’s read yaaaaa J " Syntax is the study of the principles and processes by which sentences are constructed in particular languages. Syntactic investigation of a given language has as its goal the construction of a grammar that can be viewed as a device of some sort for producing the sentences of the language under analysis."(Noam Chomsky, 2002:11) Chomsky mengatakan bahwa syntax adalah mata pelajaran/kuliah tentang prinsip-prinsip dan proses-proses dimana kalimat disusun dalam bahasa tertentu. Penelitian tentang syntax pada bahasa tertentu memiliki tujuannya tersendiri dimana susunan grammar  dapat dilihat sebagai alat untuk menghasilkan sebuah kalimat dalam sebuah bahasa. Pakar lain yang menjelaskan definisi syntax adalah Matthew, dikutip oleh Van Vallin dan LaPolla (1997:1), ia mengatakan: ‘The term ‘ syntax ’ is from the Ancient Greek syntaxis, a verbal noun whi
Baca selengkapnya

UTS

1.What is socioliguistics?             S ociolinguistics is the study of the relationship between language and society. They are interested in explaining why we speak differently in different social contexts, and they are concerned with identifying the social functions of language and the ways it is used to convey social meaning. Examining the way people use language in different social contexts provides a wealth of information about the way language works, as well as about the social relationships in a community, and the way people convey and construct aspects of their social identity through their language.   Sociolinguistics is concerned with the relationship between language and the context in which it is used.While dialect implies lexical, grammatical and/or pronunciation differences, accent is restricted to pronunciation features alone. An accent affects only the phonological level of a linguistic variety.             When we say that someone speaks with an accent
Baca selengkapnya